Hi there Betsy! Thank you for the great post!
I very much agree with you that RNs and APRNs are integral to policy formation and implementation in the hospital setting, and that policy evaluation is similar to the nursing process.
Milstead and Short (2017) describe how policy review is,
Like the nursing process, which is intended to ensure safe and effective patient care, create and facilitate excellent health professional academic and training programs, and ensure reliable research data and dissemination, qualitative and quantitative program evaluations are integral to effective policy and programming. (p. 117).
The first opportunity you mentioned for RNs and APRNs to participate in policy review at their workplace organization, is something that I don’t really feel is promoted at my workplace. It would make sense for hospital facilities to promote nursing participation in policy review, but hospital facility administrators seem to be perhaps more focused on evidence-based research review on focused hospital-acquired conditions such as VAPs, CLABSIs, and CAUTIs.
I do also concur with your suggestion of RNs/APRNs participating in policy review, by joining a professional organization such as the American Nurses Association (ANA). The ANA has a political action team that meets with legislators with whom they can collaborate on healthcare-related issues. (ANA, n.d.).
ANA leadership, its members, and staff continuously develop new and evolving legislative priorities while ANA’s federal lobbyists work in a bipartisan fashion to educate lawmakers and develop legislation on these priorities. The RN Action team alerts ANA members and nurse advocates across the country on important legislative developments such as a new bill on a nursing issue being introduced or voted out of committee. The RNAction team will call on ANA members and concerned nurse-advocates to take action and help amplify the work ANA is doing on Capitol Hill. ANA maintains constant contact, coordination, and amplification to ensure any state legislative priority has the full backing of ANA. (ANA, n.d.)
I also agree with your statement that joining a nursing organization like the ANA can have challenges, that you mentioned, such as lengthy policy review processes in part due to stakeholders, time constraints, and perhaps forced errors resulting. You further described the importance of RNs and APRNs in understanding the systematic process of policy formation and implementation. I found that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2015) describes policy review as an overarching domain, applicable to each step (domain) of the policy process: Problem identification; Policy analysis; Strategy and policy development; Policy enactment; And Policy Implementation. The process could potentially aid in nursing member education on policy review. You also made an enlightening suggestion for RNs and APRNs to anoint a champion amongst a policy review group, to assist with the timeliness and perhaps knowledge guidance with a group’s review process.
I also agreed with your statement of ethical considerations can be a challenge to policy evaluation, with your reference to utilize resources from the ANA and CDC to overcome ethical challenges. Boston et al. (n.d.) affirm that government agencies such as the ANA and CDC can assist with the ethical review process and that ethical policy analysis includes the five components of, “integrity, competence, responsibility, respect, and concern”.
Boston et al. (n.d.) states that there are,
At least two important lessons concerning the relationship between ethics and public policy. First, being able to justify policies on multiple ethical grounds has significant potential benefits: not merely does it strengthen the moral case for governmental action and increase the likely level of public support, but it also helps to ensure policies are appropriately crafted to take into account the full range of relevant ethical values. Second, the means and the ends of public policy are closely coupled. They both have ethical dimensions, and these need to be considered simultaneously rather than sequentially.
References
American Nurses Association. (n.d.). ANA advocacy toolkit. Retrieved October 22, 2021, from
https://ana.aristotle.com/SitePages/toolkit.aspx
Boston, J., Bradstock, A., & Eng. (n.d.). Public policy: Why ethics matters. Retrieved October 30, 2021, from
https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p80991/html/ch01_intro.xhtml?referer=&page=3#toc-anchor
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015, May 29). Cdc policy process. Retrieved October 24,
2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/policy/analysis/process/index.html
Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2017). Health Policy and Politics (6th Ed). [[VitalSource Bookshelf
version]] NURS – 6050 Discussion: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation.