Boost Your Grades With Us Today!

support@nursingessayscenter.com      Contact us +1 (332)-240-3699

Browse Over 10 Million Questions

Let Our Professionals Assist You With Research and Writing. 

student_PNG181.png

Discussion: Statistical and clinical significance.

respond to it 

Professor and Classmates,

There exists some confusion surrounding the differences between statistical and clinical significance. Readers of medical research view statistical significance as translating to the data holding a clinically important outcome (Ranganathan, Pramesh, & Buyse, 2015). This is not the case. Instead statistical significance informs if there is a difference or a relationship between the independent and dependent variables. Statistical significance does not mean that the difference or relationship equates to clinical significance (Chamberlain, 2019). With statistical significance the numbers conclude that the outcome is not due to chance. Clinical significance refers to the practicality of the findings. In real life situations, would these results have an impact on clinical practice? Some research may have statistical significance but may not be clinically significant, thus not resulting in a clinical change in healthcare practice (Heavey, 2015).

It is possible to have research study results that supported the acceptance of the null hypothesis and demonstrate clinical significance. For example, if a study hypothesized that a new diabetes medication had no effect on blood sugar levels and the null hypothesis could not be rejected, it is plausible that the data is not statistically significant but it can still be clinically significant. If even a small number of subjects in the study showed a decrease in blood sugar levels attributed to the introduction of the medication, this could have an effect on the clinical practice in treating such patients going forward.

Credibility has to do with verifying the results of the study as accurate or believable. In terms of qualitative research this will rely on the foundation of information gathered during either the observations or participant interviews. Credible data is more likely to result from a study that has appropriate and adequate data, as well as a good analysis of negative cases. If a study’s credibility is in question, clinical significance in practice would not be established. Credibility may be established in a variety of ways, and when these techniques are not employed it is likely the study will not be credible. One such method is triangulation. Triangulation involves using multiple methods, data sources, observers, or theories surrounding the phenomenon being studied so as to ensure a more complete representation of reality. Triangulation ensures credibility by supporting comprehensive research findings. If methods such as these are not employed, it is unlikely the findings will have clinical significance. For example, if a study to determine if physical activity affected senior mental  health did not employ methods such as triangulation and therefore was deemed not to be credible, there would be no way in which to know if there is a correlation between the two in order to be significant to clinical practice with seniors.   (Polit & Beck, 2017).

References

Chamberlain University. (2019) Retrieved from https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/46849/pages/week-6-clinical-significance-of-qualitative-research?module_item_id=6015986

Heavey, E. (2015). Differentiating statistical significance and clinical significance. American Nurse Today, 10(5), 26-28

Polit, D. & Beck, C. (2017). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

Ranganathan, P., Pramesh, C.S., Buyse, M. (2015). Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Clinical versus statistical significance. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 6(3), 169-170.

Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us

Dr. Brody

5/5

Dr. Brody

Victoria

5/5

Victoria

Fiona Writer

5/5

Fiona Writer

Dr. Kane

5/5

Dr. Kane

Our Ratings: Let the Figures Tell Our Story

Google Reviews

4.7/5

4.9

Sitejabber

4.7/5

4.6

Trustpilot

4.7/5

4.8

How It Works

Fill in the Order Form

Issue instructions for your paper in the order form. Include a discount if you have one. Your account will be created automatically.

Make your payment

The Writing Process

Download your paper

Recent Questions

Anaphylactic Shock

QUESTION Respond to at least two of your colleagues who selected at least one different factor than you in one of the following ways: Share insights on

Read More »

In a short essay (500-750 words), answer the Question at the end of Case Study 1. Cite references to support your positions. (References must be no older than 5 years): Considering the circumstances and the preliminary workup, what type of anemia does Ms. A most likely have? In an essay of 500-750 words, explain your answer and include rationale.

QUESTION In a short essay (500-750 words), answer the Question at the end of Case Study 1. Cite references to support your positions. (References must

Read More »

Stay In Touch!

Leave your email and get discount promo codes and the best essay samples from our writers!
Open chat