CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2

Uncategorized

CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2

CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2

https://nursingessayscenter.com.com/clc-ethics-and-irb-psy-362-topic-2/

Details:

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment. You will be assigned group in class. We have navigated through much research to date. As you know, ethical considerations are vital during this process. CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2After reading about Milgram’s compliance experiment and many of the early studies in social psychology, it becomes clear that participants in social psychology have suffered harm. There are safeguards in place today within the American Psychological Association’s Code of Ethics (2016) with regard to research. Institutional Review Boards have also been put in place to protect both human and animal research participants.Imagine your CLC group sits on an Institutional Review Board (IRB) and someone like Phillip Zombardo or Stanley Milgram provides you with a research proposal to conduct the same experiment(s).Task: CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2 Do some research and chose an unethical study that has been conducted thus far (i.e., Monster Study, Aversion Project, Dr. Money/David Reimer, Learned Helplessness).A quick internet search will reveal other ideas.Your job is to approve the study, approve with modifications, or reject the study completely. Using the APA Code of Ethics, justify your group’s determination. CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2 The code of ethics can be found at http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspxCreate a PowerPoint presentation, of 8-12 slides (slide count does not include the title and reference slide), in which your group presents their decision. Your PowerPoint should include:

  1. Provide a summary of the experiment.
  2. Identify some general ethical concerns with the experiment. CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2
  3. Using the APA Code of Ethics, identify at least five specific ethic codes that were violated with this study. Be sure to explain why
    CLC Ethics and IRB PSY 362 Topic 2
    CLC Ethics and IRB PSY 362 Topic 2

    there was a code violation.

  4. Provide your decision as an IRB if you will approve the study, approve it with modifications, or flat out reject it all together.

Use two to three scholarly resources for support. Your textbook is a viable source. Resources should be listed on the last slide. CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2

Include speaker notes below each content-related slide that represent what would be said if giving the presentation in person. Expand upon the information included in the slide and do not simply restate it. Please ensure the speaker notes include 50-75 words per slide. CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, including an APA formatted reference slide, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2

This CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2 assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2 assignment to Turn-it-in. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2

PSY 362 Topic 2 DQ 1

From your perspective, how does the material in your textbook on the topics of self-presentation and social perception relate to the passage from Matthew 7:3-5, in which Jesus asks: “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brothers’ eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eyes when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.”

PSY 362 Topic 2 DQ 2

Describe three important functions of the self. Give examples of each.

Abstract

 

Clinical research has grown dramatically in recent decades, and as a result, there has been a surge in interest in the ethical principles that are being followed to protect human participants.  CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2
To underline the lessons we must learn from history, this article chronologically examines historical scandals and social responses from World War II to the Death of Ellen Roche (2001). 
In order to grasp the circumstances of clinical research, international ethical norms for investigations involving human participants are briefly presented. CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2
The obligations and responsibilities of institutions and investigators in human subject research to protect study subjects’ safety and wellbeing are summarized. 
Following that, a number of hotly discussed ethical questions and perspectives are organized into problematic subjects. 
This brief overview and summary aims to highlight key points and make recommendations to institutional review boards (IRBs) in order to help shape the future of clinical research ethics as we move forward. CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2

 

Human, Institutional Review Board, Research Keywords: Ethics, Human, Institutional Review Board, Research

 

Visit: Historical Perspectives on Human Subjects 
Research

 

Human studies are critical for medical advancement, and they have increased our knowledge and ability to treat dangerous diseases and disorders. CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2
Human research, on the other hand, must consider the ethical dimensions of the reasons for conducting an experiment as well as the required procedural processes to ensure that the results are scientifically sound. 
Because the exact hazards and benefits of research are unknown, protecting human participants in research is our first responsibility, and it has been given careful consideration in the ethical conduct of research. CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2

 

“Human beings are born with the same dignity and rights as other animals. 
They are gifted with reason and conscience and should act in a brotherly manner toward one another ” (Article 1 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights). CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2
In public perceptions of human research, these rights are frequently overlooked. 
The scientific revolution, which began in the seventeenth century, ushered in a technique of study based on controlled observation and public publishing of results as proof. 
The number of people who took part in early trials was modest, and they mostly consisted of the researchers or their families. 
The most famous and well- CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2known example of this occurred in the early modern era, when Edward Jenner tested a smallpox vaccine on his son and neighboring youngsters. 
Historical events in the twentieth century paved the way for the current state of protecting human research participants. 
There have been numerous landmark events that have influenced public perceptions of human clinical research. CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2
In Fig. 1, the timeline of human subject abuses, scandals, and tragedies, as well as the responses to them, is depicted in chronological sequence. CLC Ethics and IRB: PSY 362 Topic 2